Home · Solutions · Screening
A capability of JUSTE · included in every subscription

Understand the risk before you decide what to do next.

JUSTE screens sanctions, PEP, adverse media and other relevant risk factors, then applies your codified AML policy to classify the result and determine the next step.

Each screening keeps the findings, policy context and resulting decision together — so the record explains not only what you found, but why it mattered.

AI recommendsPolicy governsHumans sign offEvidence survives
RISK SCREENINGManual✓ Policy rules applied
New client screeningCompleted in 1 min 52 s
Low risk
Sanctions screeningLowMediumHighNo match across consolidated lists
PEPLowMediumHighNo politically exposed connection found
Adverse mediaLowMediumHighNo relevant negative reporting
Activity and fundsLowMediumHighConsistent with the stated engagement
Territorial riskLowMediumHighJurisdiction rated low under your policy
Overall risk ratingLowMediumHighSimplified due diligence applies. Add an ID document to complete the record.
Screening report stored and exportablePolicy v3.1

Illustrative view of a completed screening.

What it screens

Separate the risk drivers before you decide the outcome.

A single overall score can hide the reason behind a decision. JUSTE keeps the underlying risk drivers separate, so you can see what influenced the outcome and which part of your policy applies.

The findings are then interpreted against your firm’s AML policy. Where the policy requires a different classification or control path, that rule is applied and recorded.

Sanctions — Relevant sanctions data checked as part of each screening.
Politically exposed persons — PEP status and relevant connected-person risk where supported by the underlying data.
Adverse media — Relevant negative reporting surfaced for review rather than presented as an undifferentiated hit list.
Activity and funds — Whether the stated activity and source-of-funds context are consistent with the engagement.
Territorial risk — Jurisdictional risk interpreted against the firm’s own policy.
Companies and counterparties — Screen individuals, organisations and relevant third parties within the same workflow.
Why screen first

Screen first, so the next step is proportionate.

Before you engage

Decide with information

Establish the risk context before onboarding is committed, so you can decide whether to proceed and what level of due diligence is appropriate.

During onboarding

Size the work correctly

The screening result informs the due-diligence path, so straightforward cases are not automatically pushed through the same workflow as higher-risk ones.

Afterwards

Keep the book clean

Re-screen existing clients when your policy requires it. Risk can change over time, so the current position should remain visible and traceable.

What you actually get

A screening report that explains the decision, not just the result.

Not just a result — a record

The report shows what was screened, what each risk driver returned, how the firm’s policy classified the result, and when the decision was made. It can be retained and reviewed without relying on the memory of the person who ran the check.

A hit list shows what matched. JUSTE keeps the findings, policy context and resulting position together.

Unlimited users, priced by reports

Unlimited seats let designated staff members screen within the scope your firm allows, without making user count the limiting factor.

JUSTE is priced by report volume, with unlimited seats included.

The first rung, not a dead end

When the screening indicates that more work is required, the same record can continue into KYC or KYB without re-keying the risk context that triggered the next step.

The screening context carries forward into the onboarding workflow.

Where it goes next

Screening is the first decision point, not the end of the workflow.

KYC & KYB

Carry the screening result into onboarding, identity checks, proportionate due diligence and beneficial-ownership work for corporate clients.

Explore KYC / KYB

AML administration

Run the wider AML administration around the screening decision: policy, team controls, training, supervision and firm-wide readiness.

Explore AML
Questions

Before you screen your first client.

What exactly does SCREEN check?

Sanctions lists, politically exposed person status, adverse media, activity and funds risk, and territorial risk. Each is rated separately, then classified against your own AML risk policy rather than a generic vendor score.

How long can a screening take?

A straightforward screening can complete in around two minutes in the illustrative workflow shown on this page. Actual time depends on the subject, the data available and whether any findings require review.

Is a screening report enough on its own?

It evidences who you checked, what was found and how your policy classified it. To complete onboarding you also need identity verification and, depending on the risk, further due diligence — which is what KYC and KYB adds on the next rung.

Can we screen companies, not just individuals?

Yes. SCREEN can be used for individuals, companies and other relevant counterparties, with the result retained in the same reporting format.

What about our existing clients?

Existing clients can be re-screened when your policy requires it, so changes in the risk position can be identified and recorded over time.

How is it priced?

By report volume with unlimited seats, from £900 per year for 100 reports. Unused reports roll over for up to 24 months. Every plan includes a free trial and a 90-day, 5-report money-back guarantee.

See the risk context before you decide what happens next.

Start the free trial and run a real screening, or book a demo and we will walk through how the result feeds into policy-governed onboarding.